Legislation Details

File #: 24-0324    Version: 1
Type: Public Hearings Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 5/9/2024 In control: Orange City Council
On agenda: 6/25/2024 Final action:
Title: Public Hearing to consider introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No.16-24 approving a First Amendment to Development Agreement with Chapman Orange Holdings, LLC.
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Ordinance No. 16-24, 3. First Amendment to Development Agreement
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

FROM: Tom Kisela, City Manager


1. SUBJECT
title
Public Hearing to consider introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No.16-24 approving a First Amendment to Development Agreement with Chapman Orange Holdings, LLC.
body
2. SUMMARY
The proposed First Amendment to Development Agreement with Chapman Orange Holdings, LLC would extend entitlements to build a Marriott Hotel at 3000 W. Chapman Avenue for an additional two and a half years.
3. RECOMMENDED ACTION
recommendation
1. Conduct and close Public Hearing.
2. Introduce and conduct First Reading of Ordinance No. 16-24. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Orange approving a First Amendment to Development Agreement No. 7204 by and between the City of Orange and Chapman Orange Holdings, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company.
3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a non-exclusive license in conformance with the provisions in Section 6.3 of the amended Development Agreement No. 7204.
end
4. FISCAL IMPACT
None.

5. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
Goal 2: Be a fiscally healthy community
b: Analyze future fiscal needs and potential revenue opportunities.
e: Create an environment to attract, retain, and expand economic opportunities.
6. DISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND
In June 2018, the Planning Commission approved a new Marriott dual brand hotel to replace a Motel 6 and Denny's restaurant at 3000 W. Chapman Avenue. In June 2020, the Planning Commission granted a one-year extension to the entitlements, and in June 2021, the City Council approved a Development Agreement to extend the entitlements for an additional three years.
The original development team was not able to develop the hotel project and so the property owner re-established control of the property development and is requesting a two and a half year extension to the Development Agreement. The two and a half year extension will allow the owner time to enter into an agreement with a new deve...

Click here for full text