Skip to main content
File #: 21-0153    Version: 1
Type: Public Hearings Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 3/22/2021 In control: Orange City Council
On agenda: 4/13/2021 Final action: 4/13/2021
Title: Public Hearing to consider an ordinance amending the Municipal Code adding regulations for short term rental businesses and adding land use regulations; resolutions establishing policies for permits, fines, and fees and an amendment to the Agreement with Granicus for compliance services.
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Ordinance No. 05-21, 3. Resolution No. 11317, 4. Resolution No. 11318, 5. Third Amendment to Master Subscription Agreement with Granicus, LLC

                                                                                                                                                                                                                     TO:                                          Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

 

FROM:                     Rick Otto, City Manager                                          

                                                                                                          

                     

1.                     Subject

title

Public Hearing to consider an ordinance amending the Municipal Code adding regulations for short term rental businesses and adding land use regulations; resolutions establishing policies for permits, fines, and fees and an amendment to the Agreement with Granicus for compliance services.

body

2.                     Summary

Short Term Rental properties have become more prevalent in recent years, and given the transitory nature of their tenants, Short Term Rentals can have a significant impact on residential neighborhoods when they are not properly regulated. The proposed Ordinance would recognize short term rentals as a use in the zoning code and establish restrictions for their use to protect the character of residential neighborhoods. The accompanying resolutions would establish the maximum number of short term rental permits allowed, fines for violations of regulations, and a fee for short term rental permits. The amendment with Granicus, LLC would expand the scope of services of that agreement to include short term rental compliance services.

3.                     Recommended Action

recommendation

1.                     Introduce and conduct First Reading of Ordinance No. 05-21. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Orange amending Title 5 of the Orange Municipal Code by adding Chapter 5.94 regulating the licensing and establishment of short term rental businesses in the City and amending Title 17 of the Orange Municipal Code by adding a definition, zoning requirements, and conditions for short term rental use.

2.                     Adopt Resolution No. 11317. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange establishing a fee for short term rental permits.

3.                     Adopt Resolution No. 11318. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Orange establishing the maximum number of short term rental permits allowed, establishing fines for violations of short term rental regulations, and authorizing the City Manager to develop procedures implementing these provisions.

4.                     Approve Third Amendment to Master Subscription Agreement with Granicus, LLC in the amount of $24,438 for short term rental compliance services, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute on behalf of the City.

end

4.                     Fiscal Impact

Adopting this ordinance would generate revenue by requiring short term rentals to obtain a business license, pay transient occupancy tax, and a permit fee. The total expenditure for the proposed amendment is $24,438 and will be funded through General Fund (100). Staff resources would be required to administer the program.

5.                     Strategic Plan Goals

Goal 3: Enhance and promote quality of life in the community

c: Support and enhance attractive, diverse living environments.

6.                     Discussion and Background

Short Term Rentals (STRs) are residential units (single-family homes, town homes, condominiums, apartments, etc.) that are rented for a period of less than 30 days. STRs have existed for many years but have become much more common over the last decade. Airbnb, Expedia Group (VRBO and HomeAway), and other similar sites create a convenient online marketplace for STRs.

History of STR Policy

Initially, the City of Orange took the position that as the Orange Municipal Code (OMC) does not contemplate this type of rental, it has no basis to regulate STRs. In 2013, the City began sending notices to properties listed on rental sites and informing them that they were required to obtain a business license and collect transient occupancy tax (TOT) for the City. However, in 2017 staff determined that the City could not issue a business license or collect TOT as STRs are not specifically allowed in the OMC. As a result, the City sent notices to all registered STRs informing them that STRs are not recognized as a permitted use in the OMC for residential areas, and that they would no longer be issued business licenses or be required to collect TOT. At that time, the City had 30 registered properties that generated approximately $8,000 per month in TOT. While the City no longer issued business licenses, we did not actively prohibit the activity. However, as part of this approach, it was determined that any Municipal Code Violations that arise from STRs will be addressed in the same manner as other Municipal Code Violations.

Based on discussions with STR compliance services, staff estimates that there are now approximately 200-300 properties in the city that are rented as STRs at least part of the year. Our Code Enforcement staff typically receive two to three complaints about STRs per week. The frequency of complaints spikes in the summer months and then tapers off the rest of the year. Typical complaints include noise, trash, possible illegal activity, and parking issues. However, complaints have concentrated on a couple of houses in single-family neighborhoods that have been rented out for parties that negatively impact the affected neighborhood.

STR Policy in Other Cities

Many cities, including Garden Grove, Yorba Linda, and Irvine, prohibit STRs in residential zones. Buena Park, Fullerton, and Huntington Beach have recently adopted ordinances that allow STRs with restrictions. Anaheim has gone from a moratorium, to a ban, to a policy of allowing existing STRs with restrictions. Newport Beach also allows STRs with restrictions, while San Clemente restricts STRs to certain residential areas in the city.

Previous Council Consideration

Staff provided STR policy options to the City Council at its meeting on January 14, 2020. At that time, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance to prohibit STRs and place it on the February 11, 2020 City Council agenda for consideration. At that meeting, the Council declined to adopt the ordinance prohibiting STRs and instead directed staff to prepare an ordinance that would recognize STRs as an allowable use in all zones that allow residential uses, along with restrictions to reduce their impact on residential neighborhoods.

The resulting ordinance was considered by the Planning Commission at its meeting on August 17, 2020. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance and noted the prevalence of STRs and the desirability of establishing restrictions for their use that would mitigate neighborhood impacts. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC 21-20 recommending City Council approval of the proposed ordinance. Council considered the proposed ordinance at its meeting on November 10, 2020 but did not adopt it. STRs were on the City Council agenda on January 9, 2021 and, due to the large number of public comments, the item was continued to February 9, 2021 and then continued again to a special meeting on February 23, 2021. At that meeting, the City Council directed staff to bring back the ordinance that was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission along with resolutions to set a maximum number of STR permits, a permit fee, and fine amounts.

Overview of the Proposed Ordinance

The draft ordinance contains the following provisions:

                     Defines STRs and recognizes them as a permitted use in specified residential zones.

                     Requires that STRs obtain a permit and business license and pay TOT.

                     Establishes regulations for STRs, including:

o                     Ownership limited to individuals and trusts. No STR permits will be issued to a corporation or LLC. Limit of two STR permits per individual or trust.

o                     Minimum distancing of 300 feet between STRs with exceptions for existing STRs.

o                     Occupancy limited to two people plus two per bedroom (e.g. eight people for a three-bedroom house).

o                     Minimum two-night stay.

o                     Property manager must be onsite or able to respond onsite within 30 minutes.

o                     Good neighbor policy requires notifying neighbors with contact information for the property manager.

                     Off-street parking is required.

                     Quiet time is between 10 p.m. and 9 a.m.

                     Establishes Major and Minor Offenses, with revocation of permit for three Major Offenses in a 12-month period.

                     Offenses are categorized as follows:

o                     Minor

§                     Responds to a complaint in more than 30, but less than 60 minutes.

§                     Occupancy limit exceeded by one or two people.

§                     Failure to respond to noise complaint within 30 minutes.

§                     Other violations deemed minor by City Manager or designee.

o                     Major

§                     Responds to a complaint in more than 60 minutes.

§                     Occupancy limit exceeded by three or more people.

§                     Rental of fewer than two nights.

§                     Failure to abide by Good Neighbor Policy.

§                     More than one complaint of street parking during any one occupancy.

§                     More than one noise complaint during any one occupancy.

§                     Failure to pay TOT when due.

§                     Criminal activity on the short term rental policy.

§                     Two minor offenses in a twelve month period.

§                     Failure to renew short term rental permit and/or business license by due date.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)

Section II of the proposed ordinance sets forth the reasons why the ordinance is exempt from CEQA because it is not a “project” under CEQA as it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

Overview of Proposed Resolutions

Maximum number of permits and permit fee and fine amounts are not included in the ordinance, but are proposed to be adopted by resolution so that the Council can adjust them as needed without having to amend the ordinance. Staff is proposing a permit fee of $150.

The following fine amounts are proposed in the resolution:

                     First Offense (Minor) - $250

                     First Offense (Major) - $1,000

                     Second Offense (Minor) - $500

                     Second Offense (Major) - $1,500

                     Third Offense (Minor) - $1,000

                     Third Offense (Major) - Revocation of Permit

An initial cap of 125 STR permits is also proposed to be adopted by resolution to allow Council greater flexibility to adjust this number as needed. As 125 may not be enough to accommodate all existing STRs, staff will develop procedures for allocating STR permits based on Council priorities. Staff is proposing giving priority to STR operators that previously received business licenses, properties that do not have a history of STR-related code violations, and STRs where the property owner is located close enough to respond to complaints in person in 30 minutes or less.

Public Outreach, Hosting Platforms, and Other Stakeholders

Staff has met with AirBnB and Expedia Group, which between them own hosting platforms that contain the majority of Orange STR listings. Both companies provided feedback on the proposed ordinance and are willing to assist staff in administering the program by removing listings from problem properties.

Staff has also spoken with and reviewed emails and voicemails from residents concerned about STRs in their neighborhood. Some residents have urged the City Council to ban STRs, while others would like an ordinance that provides the City with effective tools to address neighborhood impacts.

A group of Orange property owners that operate STRs has spoken at previous City Council meetings about the importance of having STRs recognized in the OMC along with common sense restrictions that protect neighborhoods. This group has provided feedback to staff about the proposed ordinance and has expressed their willingness to obtain business licenses, pay TOT, and comply with the proposed restrictions. Below are their requested changes to the proposed ordinance along with staff recommendations regarding certain proposed changes:

STR Operators: Proposed Changes to Ordinance

Section 5.94.060.G (Good Neighbor Policy)

                     Add response time to this section and define as 60 minutes by phone and 90 minutes in-person with reasonable consideration

                     Remove requirement for signatures from all but primary guest, with special concern around requirement from minors (14-17 year-old guests)

                     Confirm that electronic consent can be used for house rules

                     Allow street parking in front of STR properties

                     Adjust quiet hours to 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. to align with OMC 8.24 (quiet hours extend to 9 a.m. in the proposed ordinance)

                     Replace the phrase “as it deems necessary or prudent” in the inspections language to “with probable cause” to address fourth amendment concerns

Section 5.94.070 (Offenses)

                     Remove response time as an infraction and remove 1a and 2a as response time is covered in the Good Neighbor Policy

                     Add an appeals process as protection from unfounded complaints

                     Remove 5.94.070.B1.d and 5.94.070.B2.k (too open ended)

                     Make 5.94.070.B.2 b, c, d, and e minor offenses (currently major offenses)

                     In 2e, replace word “of” with “about”

 

Section 5.94.080 (STR Platforms)

                     Add provision for automated collection and remittance of TOT - staff recommends not including this in the ordinance and entering into agreements with the platforms where possible for this provision

                     Add “active” to Section A.2.a, so that it reads: “The total number of active Short Term Rentals in the city listed on the platform during the applicable reporting period”

                     Add “qualifying” to Section A.2.b, so that it reads: “The total number of qualifying nights all short term rental units were rented through the platform during the applicable reporting period”

                     Review any final versions, of this ordinance, especially this section, with key STR platforms - staff has reviewed the current draft ordinance with AirBnB and Expedia, the two largest platforms, and incorporated their feedback

Fee, Fines, and Maximum Number of Permits

The STR group proposes a permit fee that combined with the business license fee would be under $100. The group proposes the following fine amounts:

                     First Offense (Minor) - $100

                     First Offense (Major) - $500

                     Second Offense (Minor) - $200

                     Second Offense (Major) - $750

                     Third Offense (Minor) - $500

                     Third Offense (Major) - $1,000 and Revocation of Permit for 12 months

The group also proposes that the maximum number of permits be set at 250-300 to better accommodate the current number of responsibly operating STRs. Staff is requesting Council direction on whether to incorporate any of these proposed changes to the ordinance if it is adopted.

STR Program Administration

Should the City Council adopt the ordinance recognizing STRs, staff is recommending that the City contract with an STR compliance service. STR compliance services offer a range of services to help cities achieve compliance with STR regulations and reduce the administrative burden on City staff. Typical services include:

 

                     STR Identification - Software checks all major listing sites for listings and then verifies the address of all listings located in the City.

                     Automated Notifications - Once an STR is identified, automated notifications can be sent to the STR host to notify them of requirements to obtain a business license, pay TOT, and follow the good neighbor policy.

                     24-Hour Hotline - Allows residents to report violations of the STR ordinance at any time. The compliance service will contact the STR host and check back in 30 minutes to verify that the complaint was addressed and if not, forward the case to Code Enforcement.

                     Online Registration and Payment - Provides a simple online solution for STR hosts to apply for a permit and pay TOT.

                     Compliance Monitoring - Ongoing monitoring of listings for compliance with the STR ordinance along with assistance in auditing TOT payments.

 

The proposed Third Amendment to Master Subscription Agreement with Granicus, LLC would provide the above services for an annual cost of $24,437.99. Following the initial year of services, staff will evaluate their effectiveness and consider other options as warranted.  Staff estimates that the TOT revenue generated by 125 STRs when using a compliance service would range from $200,000 to $300,000 per year. In addition to a compliance service, the City may need to fill a vacant code enforcement position to enforce STR regulations effectively.

Alternatives

City Council may choose to adopt an ordinance that prohibits STRs in the City. For such a prohibition to be effective, the City would also need to contract with a compliance service to identify STRs and staff would work to remove STR listings and bring property owners in compliance with the ordinance. Alternatively, the City Council could allow STRs but with stricter standards than the proposed ordinance. Additional restrictions could be crafted to address specific concerns regarding STRs.

Recommendation

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 05-21 allowing STRs with the restrictions noted above and the accompanying Resolutions 11317 and 11318 along with the Third Amendment to Master Subscription Agreement with Granicus, LLC. Staff also recommends that Council provide direction on how to prioritize the allocation of STR permits.

7.                     ATTACHMENTS

                     Ordinance No. 05-21

                     Resolution No. 11317

                     Resolution No. 11318

                     Third Amendment to Master Subscription Agreement with Granicus, LLC